<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exact Match Domains for Poker Affiliates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pokeraffiliateuniversity.com/domaining/exact-match-domains-for-poker-affiliates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pokeraffiliateuniversity.com/domaining/exact-match-domains-for-poker-affiliates/</link>
	<description>Poker Affiliate University for Poker Affiliates</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:11:14 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pokerprop</title>
		<link>http://www.pokeraffiliateuniversity.com/domaining/exact-match-domains-for-poker-affiliates/comment-page-1/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>pokerprop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokeraffiliateuniversity.com/?p=1050#comment-215</guid>
		<description>Solid article however for sake of argument poker-sites.org and pokersites.org are both likely to attract the same anchor text.

Also the downside to exact match is they might be more likely to fall victim to over optimization penalties which seems to be rearing its ugly head more often again with tons of exact matches dropping an average of 8 spots recently and a few falling way off like 50 spots. So while it has benefits it also has risks.

Back on other topic:

There are many reasons not to use a -, but from my experience SEO doesn&#039;t seem to be one of them. I will sometime in next few months test that theory perhaps using something like craps-online.net or similar.

Anyways very solid post and thanks for making it. Nice site btw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solid article however for sake of argument poker-sites.org and pokersites.org are both likely to attract the same anchor text.</p>
<p>Also the downside to exact match is they might be more likely to fall victim to over optimization penalties which seems to be rearing its ugly head more often again with tons of exact matches dropping an average of 8 spots recently and a few falling way off like 50 spots. So while it has benefits it also has risks.</p>
<p>Back on other topic:</p>
<p>There are many reasons not to use a -, but from my experience SEO doesn&#8217;t seem to be one of them. I will sometime in next few months test that theory perhaps using something like craps-online.net or similar.</p>
<p>Anyways very solid post and thanks for making it. Nice site btw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Using &#34;the&#34; in domain name - Page 5 - The Forums At Poker Affiliate Listings</title>
		<link>http://www.pokeraffiliateuniversity.com/domaining/exact-match-domains-for-poker-affiliates/comment-page-1/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Using &#34;the&#34; in domain name - Page 5 - The Forums At Poker Affiliate Listings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokeraffiliateuniversity.com/?p=1050#comment-214</guid>
		<description>[...] Great article from Mike here  Exact Match Domains for Poker Affiliates [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Great article from Mike here  Exact Match Domains for Poker Affiliates [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JR</title>
		<link>http://www.pokeraffiliateuniversity.com/domaining/exact-match-domains-for-poker-affiliates/comment-page-1/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 20:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokeraffiliateuniversity.com/?p=1050#comment-201</guid>
		<description>Nice article.  I wish more people shopping for domains would read it.  A few additional points that are pertinent.  

1. Age of the domain - A domain registered in 1997 vs. a domain registered today.  The 1997 domain is given clout.

2. 2 word domains are usually better not because it is just 2 words, but rather the order of 3 words is often easier to jumble, therefore potential traffic may be lost to competition with the same words in a different order. 

3. Don&#039;t forget &quot;type-in&quot; traffic.  Domains with GOOD keywords will get visitors from day 1.  And those visitors WILL convert to customers.  WHY?  Because they didn&#039;t randomly find your site by randomly clicking along a few links, but rather they typed in exactly what they were looking for.  (and hopefully you&#039;re offering whatever that is). 

4. Evidently &quot;.org&quot; is given a bit of clout as an &quot;authority&quot;.

5. Can potential customers remember your site name?  The &quot;recall&quot; factor is a major factor, and the main reason that a short domain, or a domain with strong keywords is so valuable. Two options exist - a domain that is something really very different that requires money to brand it with creative advertising to build recall, or back to the keyword thing.  Keyword domains are worth their weight in gold.   

All of this of course is in addition to a site that has a lot of CONTENT which is KING.  

A good domain becomes more and more valuable over time as more and more people become net savvy, and more and more cell phones become internet capable.  

I&#039;ve been buying and selling domains for 10 years, and do currently have some gaming domains I may be convinced to sell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article.  I wish more people shopping for domains would read it.  A few additional points that are pertinent.  </p>
<p>1. Age of the domain &#8211; A domain registered in 1997 vs. a domain registered today.  The 1997 domain is given clout.</p>
<p>2. 2 word domains are usually better not because it is just 2 words, but rather the order of 3 words is often easier to jumble, therefore potential traffic may be lost to competition with the same words in a different order. </p>
<p>3. Don&#8217;t forget &#8220;type-in&#8221; traffic.  Domains with GOOD keywords will get visitors from day 1.  And those visitors WILL convert to customers.  WHY?  Because they didn&#8217;t randomly find your site by randomly clicking along a few links, but rather they typed in exactly what they were looking for.  (and hopefully you&#8217;re offering whatever that is). </p>
<p>4. Evidently &#8220;.org&#8221; is given a bit of clout as an &#8220;authority&#8221;.</p>
<p>5. Can potential customers remember your site name?  The &#8220;recall&#8221; factor is a major factor, and the main reason that a short domain, or a domain with strong keywords is so valuable. Two options exist &#8211; a domain that is something really very different that requires money to brand it with creative advertising to build recall, or back to the keyword thing.  Keyword domains are worth their weight in gold.   </p>
<p>All of this of course is in addition to a site that has a lot of CONTENT which is KING.  </p>
<p>A good domain becomes more and more valuable over time as more and more people become net savvy, and more and more cell phones become internet capable.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been buying and selling domains for 10 years, and do currently have some gaming domains I may be convinced to sell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.pokeraffiliateuniversity.com/domaining/exact-match-domains-for-poker-affiliates/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokeraffiliateuniversity.com/?p=1050#comment-32</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to echo what John said about some of these domains not being quite as far out of reach as you would think.

I had a read through of this last week and out of curiosity went off hunting for an exact match domain and managed to secure &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bestcasinoonline.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bestcasinoonline.com&lt;/a&gt; for less than $100.

I&#039;m fairly happy with that given the number of searches Google reports running for the phrase over the course of a month.

You do need to be flexible when hunting for domains, as the real grade one domains will all have gone. However, I&#039;m constantly suprised at just how many good, exact-match domains can be picked up elsehwere for a reasonable price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to echo what John said about some of these domains not being quite as far out of reach as you would think.</p>
<p>I had a read through of this last week and out of curiosity went off hunting for an exact match domain and managed to secure <a href="http://www.bestcasinoonline.com" rel="nofollow">bestcasinoonline.com</a> for less than $100.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m fairly happy with that given the number of searches Google reports running for the phrase over the course of a month.</p>
<p>You do need to be flexible when hunting for domains, as the real grade one domains will all have gone. However, I&#8217;m constantly suprised at just how many good, exact-match domains can be picked up elsehwere for a reasonable price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.pokeraffiliateuniversity.com/domaining/exact-match-domains-for-poker-affiliates/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokeraffiliateuniversity.com/?p=1050#comment-24</guid>
		<description>I suspect the only real/concrete proof would be to get an exact match .com/net/org and the same exact match in one of the lesser extensions .....build each with different but equally strong page titles, descriptions,and content...and then get a number of the same high PR links in to both and see what happens.

Not an easy one to do.

Until someone proves it in that way, or comes up with a valid looking alternative proof method, I&#039;d offer for debate that it looks like there&#039;s going to be at least some question on the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect the only real/concrete proof would be to get an exact match .com/net/org and the same exact match in one of the lesser extensions &#8230;..build each with different but equally strong page titles, descriptions,and content&#8230;and then get a number of the same high PR links in to both and see what happens.</p>
<p>Not an easy one to do.</p>
<p>Until someone proves it in that way, or comes up with a valid looking alternative proof method, I&#8217;d offer for debate that it looks like there&#8217;s going to be at least some question on the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.pokeraffiliateuniversity.com/domaining/exact-match-domains-for-poker-affiliates/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokeraffiliateuniversity.com/?p=1050#comment-22</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve personally never created a site on a non .com/.org/.net domain, but I based that point on what I&#039;ve seen in the SERP&#039;s and what some of my friends have told me.

An interesting test would be to take two exact matches, one .com and one .info or whatever, and point a link at each one and see what happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve personally never created a site on a non .com/.org/.net domain, but I based that point on what I&#8217;ve seen in the SERP&#8217;s and what some of my friends have told me.</p>
<p>An interesting test would be to take two exact matches, one .com and one .info or whatever, and point a link at each one and see what happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.pokeraffiliateuniversity.com/domaining/exact-match-domains-for-poker-affiliates/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokeraffiliateuniversity.com/?p=1050#comment-21</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to question the assertion that the value is only in com/net/org. Do you have actual proof that it doesn&#039;t extend to info/biz/ws etc, etc?.. other than the general community feeling on the lesser extensions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to question the assertion that the value is only in com/net/org. Do you have actual proof that it doesn&#8217;t extend to info/biz/ws etc, etc?.. other than the general community feeling on the lesser extensions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.pokeraffiliateuniversity.com/domaining/exact-match-domains-for-poker-affiliates/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 00:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokeraffiliateuniversity.com/?p=1050#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Yeah I agree with you John. A lot of domains are taken already, but if you are willing to send out a few hundred emails you&#039;ll find a good one for a fair price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I agree with you John. A lot of domains are taken already, but if you are willing to send out a few hundred emails you&#8217;ll find a good one for a fair price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ</title>
		<link>http://www.pokeraffiliateuniversity.com/domaining/exact-match-domains-for-poker-affiliates/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 22:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokeraffiliateuniversity.com/?p=1050#comment-18</guid>
		<description>I take back what I said about consolidation, I wouldn&#039;t want new affiliates to get the wrong idea.  I was referring to ultra premium exact matches like pokersites.com and the like referenced here.

I&#039;d agree with John G that there is tons of exact matches still out there especially in smaller niches, I had to check out my own domain profile to realize I own a bunch already.

An example of a small exact match might be &quot;pokerbountytournaments.com&quot; or &quot;shorthandedsngs.com&quot; and tons of other types of phrases that are still available in large numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take back what I said about consolidation, I wouldn&#8217;t want new affiliates to get the wrong idea.  I was referring to ultra premium exact matches like pokersites.com and the like referenced here.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d agree with John G that there is tons of exact matches still out there especially in smaller niches, I had to check out my own domain profile to realize I own a bunch already.</p>
<p>An example of a small exact match might be &#8220;pokerbountytournaments.com&#8221; or &#8220;shorthandedsngs.com&#8221; and tons of other types of phrases that are still available in large numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.pokeraffiliateuniversity.com/domaining/exact-match-domains-for-poker-affiliates/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokeraffiliateuniversity.com/?p=1050#comment-17</guid>
		<description>MJ,

Yeah great point. I should have clarified that anything can rank for anything, it&#039;s just a lot easier this way. I knew someone would bring up Internet-poker.co.uk, but like you said that site has so much authority anyways that the domain isn&#039;t a big factor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MJ,</p>
<p>Yeah great point. I should have clarified that anything can rank for anything, it&#8217;s just a lot easier this way. I knew someone would bring up Internet-poker.co.uk, but like you said that site has so much authority anyways that the domain isn&#8217;t a big factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

